Abstract
PURPOSE:
We determined the effects of a 3-month low-moderate-intensity strength training program (2 sessions/week) on functional capacity, muscular strength, body composition, and quality of life (QOL) in 22 young (12-16 yrs) anorexic outpatients.METHODS:
Patients were randomly assigned to a training or control group (n=11 [10 females] each). Training sessions were of low intensity (loads for large muscle groups ranging between 20%-30% and 50%-60% of six repetitions maximum [6RM] at the end of the program). We measured functional capacity by the time up and go and the timed up and down stairs tests. Muscular strength was assessed by 6RM measures for seated bench and leg presses. We estimated percent body fat and muscle mass. We assessed patients’ QOL with the Short Form-36 items.RESULTS:
The intervention was well tolerated and did not have any deleterious effect on patients’ health, and did not induce significant losses in their body mass. The only studied variable for which a significant interaction (group x time) effect was found (p=.009) was the 6RM seated lateral row test.CONCLUSIONS:
Low-moderate-intensity strength training does not seem to add major benefits to conventional psychotherapy and refeeding treatments in young anorexic patients.
My comments
This is one of those studies and subsequent findings, where any strength coach would look at it and say, “duh.” However, it’s interesting to see the outcomes quantified and compared to the same authors more recent paper, where intense/heavy weight training had very beneficial performance outcomes in patients with anorexia.
The researchers chose reasonably good exercises; bench press, shoulder press, leg extension, leg press, leg curl, abdominal crunch, low back extension, arm curl, elbow extension, seated row, and lat pulldowns, which were essentially the same exercises as the newer paper. The main difference was that in the study that worked, they did 3 sets of 8-10 reps (very similar to what a lot of strength would do) while this study did only one set of 15 reps with 20-60% of the 6 RM (a 6 RM being only ~85% of a 1 RM to begin with) nothing anyone who knows how to lift would recommend.
The big caution, apparently, being girls with anorexia have weakened bones and muscles and thus can’t handle heavy weights. However, what I think should have been apparent is that when you are basing intensities off of a RM (repetition maximum, 1 rep, 6 or whatever) a weakened person is going to have a lower max, and thus percents of it are already going to be lower, such that the safety is already built in. Working 20-60% of a 6 RM (which is already only 85% of a 1 RM) is just too light to do anybody any good, which is exactly what they found.
I still like this paper in context with the other. This paper shows that higher intensity weights not only work as per the primary authors later study, but they are necessary, because lighter weights just don’t cut it. There were similar results with intense lifting recently being found in elderly women with osteoporosis, or pretty much anybody training for fitness. Weights are supposed to be heavy, that’s why they call them weights.
Thanks for reading my blog. If you have any questions or comments (even hostile ones) please don’t hesitate to ask/share. If you’re reading one of my older blogs, perhaps unrelated to neck or back pain, and it helps you, please remember SpineFit Yoga for you or someone you know in the future.
Chad Reilly is a Physical Therapist, obtaining his Master’s in Physical Therapy from Northern Arizona University. He graduated Summa Cum Laude with a B.S. Exercise Science also from NAU. He is a Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist, and holds a USA Weightlifting Club Coach Certification as well as a NASM Personal Training Certificate. Chad completed Yoga Teacher Training at Sampoorna Yoga in Goa, India.
Leave a Reply